mirror of https://github.com/buster-so/buster.git
231 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
231 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
title: Project Name
|
||
|
author: Your Name
|
||
|
date: YYYY-MM-DD
|
||
|
status: Draft
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Project Name
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Problem Statement
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Clearly articulate the high-level problem this project solves. Include:
|
||
|
- Current state
|
||
|
- Pain points
|
||
|
- Impact on users/system
|
||
|
- Why it needs to be solved now
|
||
|
- Any relevant metrics or data
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Goals
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- List the high-level goals of this project -->
|
||
|
1.
|
||
|
2.
|
||
|
3.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Non-Goals
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- List what is explicitly out of scope for this project -->
|
||
|
1.
|
||
|
2.
|
||
|
3.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Technical Design
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Overview
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Provide a high-level overview of the technical approach:
|
||
|
- Main components
|
||
|
- How they interact
|
||
|
- Key technologies used
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
```mermaid
|
||
|
graph TD
|
||
|
A[Component A] --> B[Component B]
|
||
|
B --> C[Component C]
|
||
|
// Add your architecture diagram
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Component Breakdown
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Break down the project into logical components. For each component:
|
||
|
- Describe its purpose
|
||
|
- Reference the sub-PRD that will implement it
|
||
|
- Define interfaces with other components
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Component 1: [Name]
|
||
|
- Purpose:
|
||
|
- Sub-PRD: [Link to sub-PRD]
|
||
|
- Interfaces:
|
||
|
- Input:
|
||
|
- Output:
|
||
|
|
||
|
#### Component 2: [Name]
|
||
|
- Purpose:
|
||
|
- Sub-PRD: [Link to sub-PRD]
|
||
|
- Interfaces:
|
||
|
- Input:
|
||
|
- Output:
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Dependencies
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- List all dependencies for this project -->
|
||
|
1.
|
||
|
2.
|
||
|
3.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Implementation Plan
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Break down the implementation into sub-PRDs and clearly define:
|
||
|
1. The order in which sub-PRDs should be implemented
|
||
|
2. Which sub-PRDs can be developed concurrently
|
||
|
3. Dependencies between sub-PRDs
|
||
|
4. How to avoid conflicts between concurrent development efforts
|
||
|
|
||
|
Track the status of each sub-PRD:
|
||
|
- Complete
|
||
|
- In Progress
|
||
|
- Upcoming
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Sub-PRD Implementation Order and Dependencies
|
||
|
|
||
|
The implementation will be broken down into the following sub-PRDs, with their dependencies and development order clearly defined:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. [Foundation Component](link_to_foundation_prd.md) - **Must be completed first**
|
||
|
- This PRD establishes the core functionality needed by all other components
|
||
|
- Dependencies: None
|
||
|
- Required for: All other PRDs
|
||
|
|
||
|
2. [Component A](link_to_component_a_prd.md) - **Can be developed concurrently with Components B and C**
|
||
|
- Dependencies: Foundation Component
|
||
|
- Required for: Component D
|
||
|
- Potential conflict areas with Component B: [Describe and provide mitigation]
|
||
|
|
||
|
3. [Component B](link_to_component_b_prd.md) - **Can be developed concurrently with Components A and C**
|
||
|
- Dependencies: Foundation Component
|
||
|
- Required for: Component E
|
||
|
- Potential conflict areas with Component A: [Describe and provide mitigation]
|
||
|
|
||
|
4. [Component C](link_to_component_c_prd.md) - **Can be developed concurrently with Components A and B**
|
||
|
- Dependencies: Foundation Component
|
||
|
- Required for: None
|
||
|
- No conflicts with other concurrent components
|
||
|
|
||
|
5. [Component D](link_to_component_d_prd.md) - **Must wait for Component A**
|
||
|
- Dependencies: Foundation Component, Component A
|
||
|
- Required for: None
|
||
|
|
||
|
6. [Component E](link_to_component_e_prd.md) - **Must wait for Component B**
|
||
|
- Dependencies: Foundation Component, Component B
|
||
|
- Required for: None
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Concurrent Development Strategy
|
||
|
|
||
|
To enable efficient concurrent development without conflicts:
|
||
|
|
||
|
1. **Clear Component Interfaces**: Each sub-PRD must define clear interfaces for how other components interact with it
|
||
|
2. **Separate Database Concerns**: Ensure database schema changes are coordinated to prevent conflicts
|
||
|
3. **Modular Code Structure**: Organize code to minimize overlap between components
|
||
|
4. **Regular Integration**: Plan for regular integration points to catch conflicts early
|
||
|
5. **Feature Flags**: Use feature flags to allow merging incomplete features without affecting production
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Phase 1: Foundation
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- Describe the first phase of implementation -->
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Components:**
|
||
|
- Foundation Component
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Success Criteria:**
|
||
|
- Core interfaces defined and implemented
|
||
|
- Database schema changes completed
|
||
|
- Unit tests passing at 90%+ coverage
|
||
|
- Integration tests defined
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Phase 2: Parallel Component Development
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- Describe the second phase of implementation -->
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Components:**
|
||
|
- Component A
|
||
|
- Component B
|
||
|
- Component C
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Success Criteria:**
|
||
|
- All components implemented according to their respective PRDs
|
||
|
- Components successfully integrated with Foundation Component
|
||
|
- No regressions in Foundation Component functionality
|
||
|
- Unit and integration tests passing
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Phase 3: Dependent Components
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- Describe the third phase of implementation -->
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Components:**
|
||
|
- Component D
|
||
|
- Component E
|
||
|
|
||
|
**Success Criteria:**
|
||
|
- All components implemented according to their respective PRDs
|
||
|
- Full system integration completed
|
||
|
- End-to-end tests passing
|
||
|
- Performance benchmarks met
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Testing Strategy
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!--
|
||
|
Provide a high-level testing strategy for the entire project.
|
||
|
Each sub-PRD will have more detailed testing plans.
|
||
|
-->
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Unit Tests
|
||
|
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Integration Tests
|
||
|
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Security Considerations
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- List security considerations for the entire project -->
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Monitoring and Logging
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- Describe monitoring and logging requirements -->
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
-
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Rollout Plan
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- Describe the plan for rolling out this project -->
|
||
|
1.
|
||
|
2.
|
||
|
3.
|
||
|
4.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Appendix
|
||
|
|
||
|
### Related PRDs
|
||
|
|
||
|
<!-- List all sub-PRDs that are part of this project -->
|
||
|
- [Component 1 Name](link_to_sub_prd1.md)
|
||
|
- [Component 2 Name](link_to_sub_prd2.md)
|
||
|
- [Component 3 Name](link_to_sub_prd3.md)
|