--- title: Project Name author: Your Name date: YYYY-MM-DD status: Draft --- # Project Name ## Problem Statement ## Goals 1. 2. 3. ## Non-Goals 1. 2. 3. ## Technical Design ### Overview ```mermaid graph TD A[Component A] --> B[Component B] B --> C[Component C] // Add your architecture diagram ``` ### Component Breakdown #### Component 1: [Name] - Purpose: - Sub-PRD: [Link to sub-PRD] - Interfaces: - Input: - Output: #### Component 2: [Name] - Purpose: - Sub-PRD: [Link to sub-PRD] - Interfaces: - Input: - Output: ### Dependencies 1. 2. 3. ## Implementation Plan ### Sub-PRD Implementation Order and Dependencies The implementation will be broken down into the following sub-PRDs, with their dependencies and development order clearly defined: 1. [Foundation Component](link_to_foundation_prd.md) - **Must be completed first** - This PRD establishes the core functionality needed by all other components - Dependencies: None - Required for: All other PRDs 2. [Component A](link_to_component_a_prd.md) - **Can be developed concurrently with Components B and C** - Dependencies: Foundation Component - Required for: Component D - Potential conflict areas with Component B: [Describe and provide mitigation] 3. [Component B](link_to_component_b_prd.md) - **Can be developed concurrently with Components A and C** - Dependencies: Foundation Component - Required for: Component E - Potential conflict areas with Component A: [Describe and provide mitigation] 4. [Component C](link_to_component_c_prd.md) - **Can be developed concurrently with Components A and B** - Dependencies: Foundation Component - Required for: None - No conflicts with other concurrent components 5. [Component D](link_to_component_d_prd.md) - **Must wait for Component A** - Dependencies: Foundation Component, Component A - Required for: None 6. [Component E](link_to_component_e_prd.md) - **Must wait for Component B** - Dependencies: Foundation Component, Component B - Required for: None ### Concurrent Development Strategy To enable efficient concurrent development without conflicts: 1. **Clear Component Interfaces**: Each sub-PRD must define clear interfaces for how other components interact with it 2. **Separate Database Concerns**: Ensure database schema changes are coordinated to prevent conflicts 3. **Modular Code Structure**: Organize code to minimize overlap between components 4. **Regular Integration**: Plan for regular integration points to catch conflicts early 5. **Feature Flags**: Use feature flags to allow merging incomplete features without affecting production ### Phase 1: Foundation **Components:** - Foundation Component **Success Criteria:** - Core interfaces defined and implemented - Database schema changes completed - Unit tests passing at 90%+ coverage - Integration tests defined ### Phase 2: Parallel Component Development **Components:** - Component A - Component B - Component C **Success Criteria:** - All components implemented according to their respective PRDs - Components successfully integrated with Foundation Component - No regressions in Foundation Component functionality - Unit and integration tests passing ### Phase 3: Dependent Components **Components:** - Component D - Component E **Success Criteria:** - All components implemented according to their respective PRDs - Full system integration completed - End-to-end tests passing - Performance benchmarks met ## Testing Strategy ### Unit Tests - - - ### Integration Tests - - - ## Security Considerations - - - ## Monitoring and Logging - - - ## Rollout Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. ## Appendix ### Related PRDs - [Component 1 Name](link_to_sub_prd1.md) - [Component 2 Name](link_to_sub_prd2.md) - [Component 3 Name](link_to_sub_prd3.md)